Product DescriptionTx1521 1 Red On Clear For Pt-8000 PT-PC
Product Features
* New hybrid silicone type earbuds for better sound, more comfort, and secure fit - three sizes (S, M, L)
* Carrying case
* Cord adjuster
* Cord: 1.2m, Neck-chain type
Technical Details
* Brand Name: Sony
* Model: MDR-EX300/BLK
* Color Name: Black
* Headphones Form Factor: In-ear ear-bud
* Headphones Technology: Binaural
* Item Weight: 0.2 pounds
Customer Review
By
Adman "Cruise Wizard"(Central NY)
WHAT SOUND!!!, April 6,2009
Being
in the radio/recording field I am very particular to sound quality. Let
me first say, that everyone's ears are different and what sounds
excellent to me, might sound different to someone else. I am not
bragging, but have been told that my ears are very sensitive and can
pinpoint many quality sounds, that others cannot. I guess this might be
true, as several radio stations have retained me to fine tune their
on-air processing, since my ears have that keene sense of sound quality.
In
any event, I have the Sony EX90LP headphones which I have always
thought were very good for the price. Very loud sound pressure, good
quality high end, a fair amount of base, and a great price. Obviously,
not studio headphones, but for I-Pods, Walkman's, not bad.
I
decided to try the MDR-EX-300/BLK and I must say, at least to my ears, a
big difference, especially in the low end. The bass is more pronounced
with more depth. The high end on the other hand, is almost too high. I
had to lower my EQ settings from the EX90LP headphones, because the high
end was too saturated, which could lead to getting a headache. Not that
big of a deal if you make that slight high end adjustment.
Overall,
I would rate these headphones a 10, based on quality, and the price of
$49.95 I got them for. Compared to everything else out there, especially
at this price, these win hands down. Sony sells them for $79.95 on
their site, so I guess even compared to other headphones up to $100 I
would say these are better.
I also have a pair of BOSE ear bud phones
that sell for $99, and the BOSE phones do not even come close. Low
volume, muddy sound, hardly any bass and no high end.
As I said
earlier, you have to decide for yourself, but for the price, I would at
least give these a try. I think you will very pleased.
By
Kevin Palt (Paso Robles, CA)
1st good In-Ears..., April 29, 2010
I
purchased these back in early December of 2009. At first they are
overly sibilant in nature, and the bass is boomy and too present. Once
they are finally broken in, they sound quite good for headphones this
incredibly small. I'd estimate it is at-least 20-30 hours before you can
start to enjoy the sound from the EX- series of in-ears by Sony. A
multiple diaphragm is used with the 13mm driver, and a 2-piece diaphragm
is used with the AKG 701 headphone (the 701 requires 300 hours to break
in), multiple diaphragms can lead to a better sound-stage and a warmer
sound. The down side though is the unusually long break-in period.
The
comfort is quite good, and the silicon tips are comfortable and have
proven durable. I do not know if it is the earphones, or just the nature
of the shape of my ear-canals, but I keep having to put them back in
every 3-10 minutes (which is very annoying). I have never owned, nor
used in-ears from another company (Shure, Sennheiser, Denon, etc...), so
I cannot give an honest comparison, would neither be fair nor useful as
a review for those looking for their next purchase in portable music if
I did.
The one stupid criticism that I keep hearing is the
complaint regarding the neck-type chain of the headphones. I really like
that design, because when you are moving about, it frees up your arms
to get work done around the house (or when detailing your own car to
save cash!!!). If you do not like the neck-chain style, easy, just wrap
the R- side around the left to shorten the distance between the two, and
they are then even..... Not a giant leap of the imagination people,
seriously!!! I am not even mechanically inclined and I figured that out
in the first week ( a more highly evolved monkey than myself could have
figured it out sooner, but alas I have poor genetics, poor poor me...).
As
to the sound itself, it is warm, with a slight-emphasis towards the
upper-bass and mid-range, and the treble is a little dampened.
Regardless of what anyone will tell you, all audio equipment will have
some sort of preference, pick your poison if you will. Most people will
find the Sony sound signature pleasing and enjoyable, it is more
suitable for those that want a relaxing listening experience,rather than
dynamic and involving. These work great with all-sorts of music, and
have a definite preference for recordings that have good-excellent
dynamic range. Overly compressed recordings, or low bit-rate mp3's will
sound like crap on these, so be careful what you load on to your mp3
player. The EX-300's have very good clarity overall (once they are
burned in), and a warm, soft sound. It is true that the bass is slightly
boosted on these, but that is definitely a good thing. For you see, the
drivers are 13mm, that is 13mm. Not 40mm, not 50mm, but 13mm. They are
quite efficient and well-engineered, but still 13mm, and the bass could
use a little push so that the sound is not tinny and cold.
You do not want an in-ear to have a flat response through the bass and mid-range, it would sound like crap!!!
Just because that works great with the big boys of headphones, does not apply to the little girls of headphones.
This
should be common sense, and people should stop complaining about the
bass boost to these, besides, who in the world uses in-ears with an
i-pod or Walkman to do critical listening???
The build quality
could improve a little, but as long as you take care of them (put them
back neatly in their included carrying case), the EX-300's should last
at-least a year of regular use. The silicon-tips are very easy to put in
the ears, and take out again, with fairly decent isolation.